Anti-Competitive Agreements Fine


See the special edition of the e-competitions “Reduction of fines: an overview of EU and national case law” The Federal Cartel Office welcomes and supports the measures taken by companies to prevent infringements of antitrust rules (e.g. B staff training, risk analysis, establishment of warning and control systems, internal consequences for the parties to the agreements, etc.). Effective compliance measures help companies avoid infringements of competition law. In the event of an infringement, these measures shall contribute to the effective detection and cessation of those measures. Compliance measures can thus help to avoid or reduce fines. You can .B. Companies can gain an advantage in the race for a leading position in the leniency queue. The risks associated with an anti-competitive agreement or the abuse of a dominant position are serious. In addition to the aforementioned consequences, another risk for businesses is the disruption and deterioration of a company`s reputation resulting from lengthy investigations or subsequent disputes of customers, competitors and consumers, as well as significant legal costs and administrative time. Because of the uncertainty raised by the decision in Airtours v.

Commission, it is proposed that an alternative approach to the problem raised in the case may consider whether the concentration in question would `significantly reduce competition`. [31] According to the Article in Roller De La Mano, the new test does not insist on the necessity or sufficient value of a dominant position and argues that the old legislation provides for under-application, so that even in the absence of a dominant position, a concentration can have serious anti-competitive effects. [32] WEKO: UPC abuses hockey broadcasting rights* The Competition Commission (WEKO) fines UPC around CHF 30 million. In 2016, UPC acquired the rights to broadcast matches in the Swiss Ice Hockey Championship. For years, it refused to provide Swisscom with live hockey broadcasts. These (…) If several competitors coordinate their behaviour in the market with the aim of restricting or eliminating competition, this is called a cartel. Anti-competitive agreements between undertakings may take different forms. Agreements between competitors on prices or volumes of products and on the allocation of sales areas or groups of customers (hardcore cartels) are particularly serious. .

. .